The following was written together with colleagues from ASU’s Biosocial Complexity Initiative and the IASS Potsdam. It was inspired by my previous post on complexity economics, which initiated a brief Twitter exchange with an economist from INET Oxford. Furthermore, it is addressed to the Forum for New Economy in Berlin, especially Michael Jacobs’ plea for a new paradigm in economic thinking.
In the spirit of the new economic paradigm put forth by Michael Jacobs at the Forum for a New Economy Launch this past Halloween, we would like to offer some insights from complexity studies for thinking about this new paradigm.We hold that the economy is a quintessential example of a complex adaptive system (CAS), characterized by multi-level interactions between learning agents operating with incomplete information, emergent patterns, and path dependent development. The overall economic system can be conceived as multiple systems which partially overlap one another, encompassing what might be traditionally delineated as social, political and environmental realms.
What can this conceptualization of the economic system tell us? Here we offer three specific examples of how complexity studies could contribute to a new economic paradigm. The first is a pragmatic recognition of the limitations of predictions within complex systems. Friedrich von Hayek, in his 1972 Nobel Speech, The Pretense of Knowledge, admonishes economists for their use of scientific methods developed for studying relatively non-complex physical systems to analyze complex economic systems, and the profession’s fixation on achieving precise numerical solutions to economic problems rather than trying to understand the underlying way the economy works, albeit in a descriptive and less precise way. “I prefer true but imperfect knowledge, even if it leaves much undetermined and unpredictable, to a pretense of exact knowledge that is likely to be false.” In this regard, we believe that CAS reinforces skepticism in our ability to predict the outcomes of economic policy and the confidence with which the economics profession often describes both the world and itself.
Continue reading “Complexity & a New Economics Paradigm”
Are you new to blogging, and do you want step-by-step guidance on how to publish and grow your blog? Learn more about our new Blogging for Beginners course and get 50% off through December 10th.
WordPress.com is excited to announce our newest offering: a course just for beginning bloggers where you’ll learn everything you need to know about blogging from the most trusted experts in the industry. We have helped millions of blogs get up and running, we know what works, and we want you to to know everything we know. This course provides all the fundamental skills and inspiration you need to get your blog started, an interactive community forum, and content updated annually.
In this article I sketch out a model of immigration and multiculturalism for Western Europe and Canada (and the US?), using Berlin and Toronto as examples. It’s largely based on cultural observations and some quick history. Feel free to nitpick, but keep in mind I am trying to paint a broad description and model for thinking, not an academic paper.
Continue reading “Multiculturalism and immigrants in North America vs Europe: Toronto vs Berlin”
I was recently inspired by Arnold Kling’s blog post questioning the value of reading books as a way to learn: “The educational return on investment for the consumer is highest on essays and blog posts…Before you read the book you should search for an essay by the author that is the basis for the book.” I agree, and have found that time is better spent reading blog posts, articles summarizing books, criticisms and reviews of those posts, short video lectures, and even viewing all or part of a good MOOC (Russ Roberts at Econtalk did an ensuing podcast with Andy Matuschak, who inspired Kling in the first place. They emphasized the value of non-written learning sources such as MOOCs).
Thus, I have decided to start producing a list of articles that strike me as high bang-for-your-buck, and helped start a change in perspective I have had on an issue.
1. Devourer of Encyclopedias: Stanislaw Lem’s “Summa Technologiae”. David Auerbach. A very nice ‘summary and discussion’ of Stanislaw Lem’s Magnus Opus Summa Technologiae (500 plus pages). I really liked the book, but it is a tough slog. The article gives a taste of the book and its relevance, and is also an in-road into thinking about a lot of interesting ideas: artificial intelligence, evolutionary biology and evolutionary psychology, synthetic life, information theory, entropy and thermodynamics, complexity theory, the “singularity.” Added coolness: Lem was thinking about this stuff back in the 1960s from behind the Iron Curtain in Poland (along with writing Sci-Fi classics like Solaris).
I wrote a Medium piece on Jordan Peterson about 1 year after he started getting notoriety (in February 2018). It was the republished in an edited and truncated form on international policy digest here, which actually lost some of the context and tried to make it more negative. I am reposting my full updated version below, just to bring my blog up to date; but this is a bit dated. Some views have changed, and in my opinion Peterson has morphed several times over the past 2 years, especially when you watch his older, more normal footage (as I did ie watching his entire 2016 Lecture series The Maps of Meaning on Youtube.) Overall he’s been a nice gateway into some pressing issues. Some of the points in the article may have dated themselves a bit already, but I do hope it brings up a few points of interest.
Updated Version of Article (last edited June 2018).
Title: The Jordan Peterson Effect
In the first year or so following the arrival of Jordan Peterson on the media scene (until roughly January 2018), most journalistic attempts at discussing him were poorly written and ill-informed, it was pretty evident that the journalists were regurgitating second-hand accounts or summaries or short YouTube clips. However, in the past 6–7 months, this has changed, partially as a function of the increased media attention (FT Lunch), but also the publication of Peterson’s book and media interviews which attained viral status.
There has been a lot written on
Peterson, and this is not meant to be a review of his books or ideas. Rather,
just as food for thought, here is a list of a few of Peterson’s views which I
feel are underdeveloped or even misleading, and want to flag for others to
1) All social systems equally lead
to extreme inequality aka the power of the Pareto distribution
Of course all social systems lead to
some degree of inequality (economically, but also in terms of political power,
etc). However, Peterson’s reliance on
the law of Pareto distribution
is too crudely employed, and used to rationalize societal outcomes that in fact